Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Litigation Between Indian Tribes Over Burial Sites Dismissed On Sovereign Immunity Grounds

By Howard Friedman on March 17, 2021

In Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, (MD AL, March 15, 2021), the Creek Nation– an Indian tribe that was forced into Oklahoma in the 1830’s from its original location in Alabama– sued the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (PBCI) as well as federal officials over a casino and hotel which PCBI built on land in Alabama that contained ceremonial grounds and burial sites that once belonged to the Creek Nation. The court held that the claims against PCBI and its officials are barred because of sovereign immunity. Because the tribe or its officials are an indispensable party to the litigation, the other defendants were also dismissed. The court added:

A narrower suit seeking more limited relief–such as the return of the bodies and funerary objects buried at Hickory Ground to the descendants of the deceased–may not trigger the same sovereign interests that preclude this litigation from proceeding, particularly if such a suit were directed at specific tribal officials responsible for PBCI’s ongoing control of those bodies and artifacts.

  • Posted in:
    Government, Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Religion Clause
  • Organization:
    Howard M. Friedman
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo