Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

What’s In A Name? Unwanted Kardashian Affiliation Dooms High-End Cosmetic Product

By Michael Sandusky & Jason Gordon on February 6, 2017

The Eleventh Circuit recently denied the Kim, Khloe, and Kourtney Kardashian’s (the “Kardashians”) motion to compel arbitration related to a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by upscale cosmetics company, By Lee Tillett (“Tillett”). The parties are now set to litigate the matter in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.  Tillet produces and markets the high-end cosmetic line, Kroma EU.  In an effort to break into the U.S. market, Tillet sent a basket of Kroma products to Kim Kardashian.  Soon after receiving the Tillet gift, according to the complaint, the Kardashians marketed their own makeup line under the Khroma name.  Tillett contended that the Kardashians hijacked the Kroma name, causing wide-spread consumer confusion.

Takeaway:  Companies looking to market products in the foreign jurisdictions by sending those products to celebrities should take caution to ensure their intellectual property rights are protected in the jurisdiction before sending the products.

  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    AdLaw By Request®
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo