Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Andrikopoulos Affirmed – Advancement Claims Not Afforded Priority in Receivership

By Fox Rothschild LLP on June 10, 2016

In 2015, the Court of Chancery ruled upon the then novel issue under Delaware law as to what priority level advancement claims should be afforded in a receivership action.  Then Vice Chancellor Parsons held that claims for advancement are not entitled to administrative priority, and instead are considered to be pre-petition, non-priority unsecured claims.  For a link to a summary of the Court of Chancery decision, click here.  The Court of Chancery’s opinion can be found here: Andrikopolous v. Silicon Valley Innovation Company, LLC, C.A. No. 9899-VCP (Del. Ch. July 30, 2015).

On June 8, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court, en banc, rendered an order affirming the Court of Chancery’s holding based upon the well-reasoned opinion issued by that Court.

If you would like to speak to a litigator in Fox Rothschild’s Delaware office, please reach out to Sid Liebesman (302) 622-4237 or Seth Niederman (302) 622-4238.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate Compliance
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo