Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Delaware Chancery Court: Automatic Stay Does Not Apply To Order Compelling Shareholder Meeting

By Sunghee Sohn on January 22, 2008

The Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog discusses the case of Fogel v. U.S. Energy Systems, Inc., 2008 WL 151857 (Del. Ch., Jan. 15, 2007) –

The Chancery Court cited to a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit–which in turn relied on a Delaware Supreme Court decision, that asserted the “well-settled rule that the right to compel a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of electing a new board subsists during reorganization proceedings.” Moreover, the Chancery Court relied on a U.S. Supreme Court decision for the principle that: “a corporation in Chapter 11 reorganization continues to owe duties to its shareholders and that ‘the passage into bankruptcy does not sound the death knell for the shareholders’ role in corporate governance.'”

You can download a copy of the decision from the Delaware Litigation Blog.

For a case where Judge Mullins in the Northern District of Georgia refused to compel a shareholders meeting until the debtor company complied with SEC regulations, see this post about the case of In re Allied Holdings, Inc, et al., Case No. 05-12525, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1598 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. April 20, 2007)(Mullins)

  • Posted in:
    Bankruptcy
  • Blog:
    Georgia Bankruptcy Blog
  • Organization:
    The Law Office of Scott B. Riddle
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo