UK Healthcare Law Blog

Latest from UK Healthcare Law Blog

Introduction

  • The approach to causation in clinical negligence cases has changed significantly over the past 20 years. In this article I consider whether as practitioners we are about to see another significant step forward or whether in practical terms little has changed.
  • Life before Bailey

  • Before Bailey v. MoD, most clinical negligence practitioners thought that
  • This is another decision from Mr Justice Ritchie which, like CNZ v Bath, focusses on consent in an acute setting rather than the more leisurely context of the outpatient clinic.
  • The Claimant suffered spinal cord injury as a result of the penetration of her spinal cord by an anaesthetic needle.
  • An epidural had been recommended
  • Summary: The High Court has today handed down judgment in Marc Traylor and Kitanna Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust, a clinical negligence case full of interesting legal issues including the application of the illegality doctrine, voluntary assumption of risk, contributory negligence and Human Rights Act claims.  Although the claims ultimately