Latest from Presnell on Privileges

Print 🖨 PDF 📄Each of the fifty states recognize some variation of medical peer-review privilege that protects from compelled disclosure certain defined information arising from a healthcare provider’s peer-review activities. Virmani v. Novant Health, Inc., 259 F.3d 284 (CA4 2001).  The privilege encourages medical providers to hold candid discussions following an adverse medical

Print 🖨 PDF 📄Federal banking regulations, such as this FDIC regulation, mandate the confidentiality and non-discoverability of suspicious-activity reports (SAR) without mentioning the word “privilege.” As you can read more about in 1-6 Privileges & Protections: TN & Sixth Circuit Law § 6.05 (2024), many courts have nevertheless ruled that these

Print 🖨 PDF 📄It’s a conundrum, for sure.  A company receives notice of potential wrongdoing, directs its in-house counsel to investigate the issue, and then must decide how, if at all, to affirmatively use the investigation to defend its conduct.  A significant consideration in determining whether to use investigation results is waiver of privilege

Print 🖨 PDF 📄
Employers routinely investigate employee harassment or hostile-work-environment complaints yet inconsistently achieve privilege protection for those investigations.  For instance, a Florida employer failed to achieve privilege protection for notes of its investigator—who doubled as an attorney and HR Director—regarding an employee’s FMLA claim.  And a North Carolina law firm lost privilege protection

Print 🖨 PDF 📄
I am thrilled to announce the publication of Privileges and Protections: Tennessee and Sixth Circuit Law. My former law partner turned law professor Kristi W. Arth and I completed this years-long journey and are delighted that LexisNexis/Matthew Bender added this treatise to its comprehensive collection of legal publications.

Todd Presnell