Ross Runkel

Ross Runkel Blogs

Blog Authors

Latest from Ross Runkel

I rarely predict that the US Supreme Court will decide a case unanimously. I’m doing so now.On October 4, 2024, the Court granted certiorari in Ames v. Ohio Dep’t of Youth Servs. [Briefs] Marlean Ames is a heterosexual woman who alleged that her employer – the Ohio Department of Youth Services – discriminated

Is the NLRB unconstitutional?So far, no court has said so. But storm clouds are forming courtesy of Amazon, SpaceX, Starbucks, and Trader Joe’s.A prime target for the naysayers is the fact that NLRB Members can be removed by the President only “upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for

Does federal law require overtime payments for more than 8 hours in one day?No.Federal law – the Fair Labor Standards Act – requires overtime payments (1.5 times the regular rate) for hours that are more than 40 in one week.Federal law does NOT require overtime payments for more than 8 hours in one day.Many state

Is this an ADA disability? – Temporary back pain, with chiropractor’s limitations on lifting and bending.[Morgan v. Allison Crane (3rd Cir 09/04/2024) [PDF] prompted me to ask this.]First, don’t be fooled by “temporary.” Years ago the US Supreme Court held that an impairment must be “permanent or long term” in order to qualify.

Has the NLRB ruled that Amazon is a joint employer of subcontracted delivery drivers?No, even though recent click-bait headlines are saying this.The NLRB itself has not made such a ruling.An NLRB Regional Director in California has made a “merit determination” which is an early step in a process that could put the issue in front

Can I opt in to a FLSA collective action without proving the court has personal jurisdiction over MY claim?”No,” according to a recent 7th Circuit decision. A court overseeing a collective action must secure personal jurisdiction over each plaintiff’s claim, whether representative or opt-in, individually. Vanegas v. Signet Builders (7th Cir 08/16/2024) [PDF].A

Can the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) apply to pre-enactment events?”Yes,” sometimes.The EFAA renders arbitration agreements invalid and unenforceable, at the election of the complainant, in sexual assault and sexual harassment cases. But it applies only to claims that “accrue” after the effective date – March 3, 2022. So

The 1st amendment is still alive, even for an employee who posted a “shocking” and “highly offensive” message on his Facebook page. The 6th Circuit recently held that a public library violated the 1st amendment when it fired a security guard for posting a meme that said “ALL LIVES SPLATTER” — obviously a crude word

Can a co-worker’s single racial slur result in employer liability?”Yes,” according to yesterday’s California Supreme Court decision in Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office (California 07/29/2024) [PDF].I am unaware of any other court decision, and the California court did not cite one, that holds that a single use of the N-word by

California no longer requires a party seeking to avoid arbitration to prove they were prejudiced. The California Supreme Court on Thursday abrogated a rule that had been followed for decades. Quach v. California Commerce Club (California 07/25/2024) [PDF] This case was brought under the California Arbitration Act, so that statute now lines up with