Critical Legal Thinking

In late 2021, a small group of legal scholars began a discussion about possibly setting up a new academic association for law and humanities research which would be registered in the UK, but open to people around Europe and the world. This led to a small, reflective event at Warwick Law School in early 2022,

Human rights and equality appear as ideals appealing to most if not all people across the globe. However, the way people understand and experience these ideals can vary significantly since even the most conservative politicians or activists use these ideals in some shape or form. This reveals complexity and multidimensionality of equality and human rights

The concept of “securitization” was developed by the Copenhagen School to analyze the process whereby powerful actors such as governments identify a particular phenomenon as an existential threat and legitimize the use of extraordinary measures to combat it. The concept of securitization challenges the traditional understanding of security as something objectively given, highlighting how specific

Although a common topic in colonial historiography, the influence of large-scale labor on the creation of built environments—including the design, construction, and maintenance of infrastructure, buildings and landscapes—has not been fully explored in the context of colonial architecture. The topic has significant implications not only for the description of past societies, but especially for the

The Argumentation 2025 conference continues the project of creating space for alternative perspectives on law, fostering the emergence of critical jurisprudences that challenge legal orthodoxy. This year’s theme is Games of Law, an invitation to explore how legal practices can be viewed through the metaphor of games and the deeper implications this brings for understanding legal authority, fairness,

Anne-Mie Van Kerckhoven / AMVK; Bloem van Smarten (1990-1991)On 30 and 31 January 2025, a group of researchers participated in a workshop examining digital sovereignty through a feminist lens (see below for full list of contributors).[1] Digital or technological sovereignty is increasingly claimed by various actors, ranging from powerful states or supranational entities like China

This analysis introduces two solid critical arguments—one ontological, the other historical—that illuminate the unique features of the theory of encryption of power, what sets it apart from other theoretical endeavors. The results are deeply intertwined, highlighting the theory’s unified structure.The historical proof: It focuses on a quantum leap in the meaning of sovereignty from the