In SEC v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859, 603 U.S. __ (2024), the Supreme Court held that the Seventh Amendment prohibits the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) from seeking civil penalties in certain enforcement actions when the Commission chooses to proceed in-house before its own administrative law judges (ALJs), rather than in federal court. In a 6-3 opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that the Seventh Amendment requires, at a minimum, that any fraud action involving civil penalties be tried in front of a jury in federal court. The Court’s decision will have immediate implications for the SEC’s enforcement program and will likely have broader implications for administrative adjudications for a host of federal agencies and federal laws.
Latest Post
More Posts
Disruptive Technology Strike Force Announces Its First Declination to Prosecute Under the National Security Division’s Voluntary Self-Disclosure Program
BIS Continues Enforcement Policy Ramp-Up
Department of Education Guidance Expands Possible Liability for Private Companies That Contract With Higher Education Institutions
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org