In a dispute over a traffic impact fee imposed on a residential building permit by El Dorado County, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the long-standing position of California and other state courts that the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution applies differently when permit conditions are imposed legislatively rather than administratively. Sheetz v. County
Latest Post
More Posts
San Diego’s Removal of Building Height Limit Improperly Relied Upon Earlier Program EIR for Community Plan
FTC Proposes New Rules for Subscription Services—Public Comments Now Open!
The Latest on the EU’s Proposed Artificial Intelligence Act
National Advertising Division Expands Fast-Track SWIFT Process for 2023
FTC To Hold Workshop on “Recyclable” Claims as Part of Continuing Green Guides Review
Court of Appeal Upholds Most of EIR for New A’s Stadium
Court of Appeal Reevaluates Decision in Light of California Supreme Court’s Decision in Naranjo
FTC Settlement With NutraClick Reimburses Customers Nearly $1 Million for Recurring Subscription Practices
33rd Annual Land Use and Development Law Briefing — Materials Available
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
- Asset Management ADVocate
- California Land Use & Development Law Report
- Consumer Finance Legal Report
- Consumer Protection Review
- Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance for Businesses
- Derivatives & Repo Report
- Food & Consumer Packaged Goods Litigation
- Privacy Quick Tips
- Tech Risk Report
- The Fintech Report
- Trade Secret Tracker
- Virtual Currency Report
- Wage & Hour Developments
Firm/Org