An Idaho federal court has resolved the tension between that state’s restrictive abortion law and the federal Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) in favor of a hospital system’s obligation to stabilize pregnant patients even if that care includes terminating a pregnancy, at least temporarily.
Latest Post
More Posts
Blizzard of Executive Orders Signals Trump Administration’s Healthcare Priorities
False Claims Act Enforcement Trends in Healthcare: FY 2024
Update: Appellate Showdown Over FCA Qui Tam Provision’s Constitutionality Reaches Eleventh Circuit
Zafirov Decision Sets Stage for Appellate Showdown Over Constitutionality of FCA’s Qui Tam Provision
What’s it to You? Justice Scalia’s 41-Year-Old Gatekeeping Question on “Standing” Influences Court to Uphold FDA’s Regulation of Mifepristone
New Safe Harbor and General Compliance Program Guidance Provides Opportunity for Buyers to Mitigate Litigation and Fraud Risk
Teva FCA Decision Sheds Light on Varying Interpretations of the Elements of an FCA Claim
OIG Issues Information Blocking Penalties Final Rule: Health IT Developers and Health Information Exchanges/Networks Have a Million Reasons to Care
The Supreme Court Clarifies the Government’s FCA Dismissal Power and Invites Constitutional Challenge to the FCA’s Qui Tam Provision
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org