For nearly two decades, the fate of Camille Pissaro’s Rue St. Honoré, après midi, effet de pluie (Rue Saint-Honoré in the Afternoon. Effect of Rain) (1897) (the “Painting”)[1] has hung in the balance, as courts have considered a variety of questions raised by an action the heirs of an original owner brought for the
Latest Post
More Posts
Sometimes a Banana is Just a Banana: Morford v. Cattelan
SCOTUS Warhol Decision Articulates Narrow Limitation to Transformative Fair Use
Implications for Art Dealers in Anti-Money Laundering Provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2021
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org