It’s not every day that the Court of Appeals spends almost 12 pages talking about the appellate rules, including why rules compliance is so important. But that’s exactly what the Court of Appeals did in Harney v. Harney. Why? The appellant’s brief used an appendix to circumvent the 8,750 word-count limit. And then the
Latest Post
More Posts
Southern Hospitality: Difference Between Leaving an Error Preservation Door Unlocked And Inviting Someone to “Come on In”
The Lights Are Still On: Oral Notices of Appeals in Criminal Cases
En Banc Rehearing in the North Carolina Court of Appeals: A Petition for Panel Rehearing in Disguise?
Fast Talk: Compressed Oral Arguments in N.C. Court of Appeals
Just in Time for Halloween: Has the Specter of Viar Returned?
Judge Riggs Appointed on Monday; Issues COA Opinions on Tuesday; On Supreme Court Bench Wednesday
Appellate Rule Amendment: Service of Appellate Documents in the Trial Court Using Odyssey
Relying on a Motion to Dismiss Response to Address Appellate Jurisdiction Arguments? Maybe Don’t Count on It
Avoiding Big Problems with Small Details: Protecting Sensitive Information and Including the “Littlest Big” Detail With Notices of Appeal
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org